Quick answer: Performance marketing works best as one connected system across Google Ads, Meta Ads, landing pages and tracking — not disconnected specialists each optimising a different metric. Australian benchmarks run Google Search CPC AUD 2–4 cross-industry and Meta CPM AUD 9.63–21.73, with budget moving toward whichever channel produces qualified leads most efficiently.
Performance marketing done properly is one system, not three disconnected agencies each optimising for their own channel's vanity metric. A Google Ads specialist optimising for clicks, a Meta specialist optimising for reach, and a web developer who never sees either campaign's data is how budget gets spent efficiently on paper and inefficiently in reality — no one owns the number that actually matters: cost per qualified lead.
We run Google Ads, Meta Ads, landing pages and conversion tracking as one connected system for Australian accounts, budgeted natively in AUD against real published Australian benchmarks — Google Search CPC commonly AUD 2–4 cross-industry (higher in contested verticals), Meta CPC around AUD 1.47, Meta CPM in the AUD 9.63–21.73 range depending on vertical and period (source, source, verified 2026) — not a converted ringgit figure that misjudges what the Australian market actually costs.
Every claim across every channel — ad copy, landing page copy, offer terms — is reviewed against Australian Consumer Law before launch. Rankings, reach and clicks are worthless if the underlying claim invites an ACCC complaint.
What's included
- Google Ads and Meta Ads under one strategy. Budget allocated by what's actually producing qualified leads at an acceptable cost, reviewed and rebalanced on an ongoing basis — not split evenly by default.
- Landing pages built for the traffic. Pages that match search or social intent specifically, not a generic homepage every campaign points to.
- Unified tracking. One source of truth for lead quality across channels, so budget decisions are made on real enquiry data, not platform-reported clicks.
- ACL-compliant claims across every channel. Pricing, comparisons and testimonials reviewed once, applied consistently everywhere they appear.
- AUD-native reporting. Cost per lead, not impressions or reach, is the number every report leads with.
Curated from published third-party sources (rockingweb.com.au, cross-referenced against wordstream.com), verified 2026-07-27 — not first-party managed-account data like our MY/SG figures. — full data in our AU ad benchmarks.
One Compliance Standard, Every Channel
The single most common way ACL compliance breaks down in a multi-channel programme isn't a deliberately misleading claim — it's inconsistency. A pricing claim gets corrected on the Google Ads landing page after a review, but the same outdated claim is still live in a Meta carousel that was built separately and never revisited. Under ACL Section 18, each individual instance of a misleading claim is its own exposure, regardless of whether the other channel got it right.
We run one claims register per account — pricing, comparisons, testimonials, offer terms — reviewed centrally and applied to every channel that uses them, so a correction made on one channel propagates everywhere the same claim appears, rather than requiring someone to remember to update it in three other places.
Comparing quotes from multiple agencies? See our guide to choosing an Australian marketing agency and our honest breakdown of what digital marketing costs in Australia.
For regulated verticals the AHPRA/TGA surface applies at the campaign level: our Australia aesthetic clinic marketing and Australia dental clinic marketing programmes build against the AHPRA advertising guidelines and TGA therapeutic-goods restrictions from the outset, not as a compliance retrofit after a complaint.